Blogs » Law and Legal Services » Deutshmann Personal Injury & Disability Law - PERSONAL INJURY & DISABILITY LAW BLOG
 

Blogs

Deutshmann Personal Injury & Disability Law - PERSONAL INJURY & DISABILITY LAW BLOG
Minimum Maintenance Standards not defence for all roadway circumstances.
Return to Blog 
Paquette Travers & Deutschmann, Personal Injury & Disability Lawyers Logo

The Minimum Maintenance Standards does not provide a municipality with a defence for snow and ice removal in all circumstances. Each case is fact specific and Minimum Maintenance Standards may not apply. The underlying test is reasonableness in fulfilling its obligations under the Municipal Act.

A recent Ontario court of appeal decision considered the Minimum Maintenance Standards for Municipal Highways regulations developed by the Ontario government. In this case the weather forecasts clearly indicated that snow would be falling in the day ahead. Approximately 2cm of snow fell starting at 4:00am prior to the accident. The accident occurred at 7:00am. The road was covered with snow and ice. The road was a hazard to users. The icy conditions were caused by the compacting of snow by traffic, not due to ice pellets falling on the road.   The municipality began salting operations at 7:15am. The trial judge determined that it was apparent to any reasonable person monitoring the roads that salting operations should have started significantly earlier. Proper monitoring of the weather forecasts would have resulted in an appropriate operational response. Salt applied at the beginning of the storm would have prevented the build-up and formation of icy conditions. The trial judge concluded that the municipality did not keep the road in a state of repair that was reasonable in the circumstances and “but for” this failure on the part of the municipality, the accident and injuries to the accident victim would not have occurred. The trial judge also determined that the defences provided under the provincial Minimum Maintenance Standards for Highway Maintenance did not apply to the circumstances of this case. 
The affect of the Minimum Maintenance Standards is that where a municipality complies with the minimum standards the it will not be found liable even though it did not maintain the highway in a state of repair that is reasonable in the circumstances, knew or ought to reasonably have known of the faulty state of repair and did not take steps to prevent the default. The municipality is not liable for negligently failing to maintain the highway if it complied with the minimum standards that applied to its failure.   The Minimum Maintenance Standards does not attempt to cover all circumstances that may arise in the course of maintaining roadways.   In this case the highway was a class 2 road. The Minimum Maintenance Standards for clearing snow accumulation did not apply to this case as less than 5 centimeters of snow accumulated. There was no minimum standard for clearing accumulated snow on a class 2 highway when the accumulated snow was less than 5 centimeters. 
The Court of Appeal held that although the Minimum Maintenance Standards did not apply to this case does not leave this fact situation unregulated. A municipality must take steps to keep the highway in a reasonable state of repair having regard to all the circumstances pursuant to s.44 (1) of the Municipal Act. The determination of compliance depends on the facts but the standard is grounded in reasonableness. The municipality is required to take reasonable steps and will only be found liable if its conduct is found to fall below the reasonableness standard.   The appeal court further held that the Minimum Maintenance Standards did not establish a minimum standard to address the accumulation of less than 5 centimeters of snow on a class 2 highway and it did not establish a minimum standard for the maintenance of a highway before ice is formed and becomes an icy roadway.
The trial judge had apportioned liability 50/50 between the municipality and the injured party. The court of appeal noted that the question of degree of fault is difficult. One could say that the accident would not have occurred but for the municipalities failure, it could also be said that it would not have occurred had the motor vehicle driver exercised due care. In this case, the driver had some warning as to the condition of the road and the circumstances that led the driver to lose control. The court of appeal supported the trial judge’s apportionment of liability.

 

Posted on Wednesday, May 09, 2012 - 08:34:00 AM EST
 Comments  (0) Post a Comment 
   By Deutschmann Personal Injury & Disability Law - Visit Our Business Directory Listing  |   Return to Blog 

Blogs Home   |   Start a Blog   |   Subscribe To Blog
News   |   Announcements   |   Events Calendar
Contact The News Editor   |   News FAQs

 
    <<     July  2020     >>   
S M Tu W Th F S
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  
Jump to:

Article Categories
Disability Law
Car Insurance
Community
Law Enforcement
Personal Injury Law
Safety

Recent Articles
Drug Impaired Driving
Auto insurance deductibles unfair to seniors, homemakers, children and the disabled.
Should We Name and Shame Impaired Drivers?
Brain Injury and Psychiatric Illness
Women and Concussion
Feds Pushing Provinces to Stiffen Distracted Driving Laws
Government Proposing Tax on Employer Health Benefits
NFL Settles $30 Million CTE Lawsuit
Undiagnosed Concussions Common Following Car Accidents
Stunt Driving - What it is, What it will cost you
Construction Season Ramping Up, Again
Lawyer Fees
TBI Diagnosis with A Microwave Helmet
Are Ride Hailing Apps Reducing Drunk Driving Rates?
Using Microwaves to Catch Post TBI Brain Bleeds
Outdoor Adventures Aren't Without Dangers
Who has the right of way in designated cyclist lanes?
Are Young Athletes Really Ready to Return to Play Post-Concussion?
Spit Test May Indicate Severity of Concussions in Children
Wildlife strikes can be deadly

Articles by Month of Posting
January 2018
January 2017
January 2016
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
August 2012
July 2012
May 2012
April 2012